daigai

Well-Known Member
Link tải luận văn miễn phí cho ae Kết nối
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Research dealing with various aspects of the theory of planned behavior
(Ajzen, 1985, 1987)is reviewed, and some unresolved issues are discussed. In
broad terms, the theory is found to be well supported by empirical evidence.
Intentions to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high
accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived
behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behav
ioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior. Attitudes,
subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are shown to be related to
appropriate sets of salient behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about the
behavior, but the exact nature of these relations is still uncertain. Expectancy
value formulations are found to be only partly successful in dealing with these
relations. Optimal rescahng of expectancy and value measures is offered as a
means of dealing with measurement limitations. Finally, inclusion of past be
havior in the prediction equation is shown to provide a means of testing the
theory’s sufficiency, another issue that remains unresolved. The limited avail
able evidence concerning this question shows that the theory is predicting
behavior quite well in comparison to the ceiling imposed by behavioral reli
ability. 0 1991 Academic Press, Inc.
As every student of psychology knows, explaining human behavior in
all its complexity is a difficult task. It can be approached at many levels,
from concern with physiological processes at one extreme to concentra
tion on social institutions at the other. Social and personality psycholo
gists have tended to focus on an intermediate level, the fully functioning
individual whose processing of available information mediates the effects
of biological and environmental factors on behavior. Concepts referring
to behavioral dispositions, such as social attitude and personality trait,
have played an important role in these attempts to predict and explain
human behavior (see Ajzen, 1988; Campbell, 1963; Sherman & Fazio,
1983). Various theoretical frameworks have been proposed to deal with
the psychological processes involved. This special edition of Organiza
tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes concentrates on cogni
I am very grateful to Nancy DeCourville, Richard Netemeyer, Michelle van Ryn, and
Amiram Vinokur for providing unpublished data sets for reanalysis, and to Edwin Locke for
his comments on an earlier draft of this article. Address correspondence and reprint requests
to Icek Ajzen, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
01003-0034.

Link Download bản DOC
Do Drive thay đổi chính sách, nên một số link cũ yêu cầu duyệt download. các bạn chỉ cần làm theo hướng dẫn.
Password giải nén nếu cần: ket-noi.com | Bấm trực tiếp vào Link để tải:

 

Các chủ đề có liên quan khác

Top